Without an installer, be prepared to use the command line. Phoronix requires PHP installed to run properly. Third-party software like Unigine’s Heaven, for instance, can be leveraged by Phoronix’s automated process. Phoronix Test Suite is not a benchmark itself, but a framework that lets you to tap into a library of 130 benchmarks and 60 suites, along with external benchmark programs via an extensible scripting architecture. This isn’t a problem for short-duration, score-style benchmarks, but longer-cycle stability tests could cause failure if components have inadequate or damaged cooling systems-and that includes a dust-choked fan or blocked case vent! Phoronix Test Suite: Great for Linux lovers Most CPU and GPU cooling systems aren’t designed for the workloads stress-testing places on them. Like all stress-test-oriented benchmarks, you should take care when you let this code run free. Stopping the tests can take a moment, as the interface doesn’t immediately respond to commands while the system is processing at full-tilt. Feature names tend toward jargon, such as process priority and number of threads. Hyper Pi’s tiny size and run-anywhere ability make it well suited for laptop use, but the Windows-XP-style interface is stodgy. What you won’t get with Hyper Pi is style points. It also hammers hard on memory access, which makes Hyper Pi the tool of choice when those high-speed DIMMS arrive. Using the Super Pi engine to perform calculations, Hyper Pi threads multiple instances, all the better to strain multi-core CPUs to their limits. Hyper Pi is primarily a mathematical test tool to figure the value of pi to a desired number of digits, but it moonlights as a CPU and memory stress test, making it a favorite with system builders.Įach pane of the Hyper Pi interface window represents a process assigned to a thread. Hyper Pi: Solid stress test, minus some style points The only shocker is reserved for the professional version: It includes scripting and technical support services, and it costs $899. Best of all, those versions are just a few bucks more than free (think phone-app pricing). A 576p mode is included for mobile system benchmarking.īasic and advanced levels increase the resolution and include online community ranking boards. Six testing module comprise the Catzilla suite. A full run on a slower machine could take up the better part of a workday. Take heed: One of PCMark’s shortcomings is its leisurely pace. On Wi-Fi-bound systems like Microsoft’s Surface Pro, just getting the installation files on the SSD is a time-consuming chore.Īt least tests are served up with estimates for the time required to complete them. The two problems Futuremark didn’t fix with version 2.0 are download size and run time. Note the estimated time for just the Storage Test. A compatibility toggle exists in the paid version for historical comparison.Ī full PCMark 8 run can take up the entire workday. Note that big changes to the benchmark code mean that you can’t compare results from this version with those of previous versions. Fortunately, Futuremark allows partial installs to generate usable, if incomplete, results. While this is impressive in terms of realism and relevance, it also means that you’ll need to have those pricey packages installed to get a full set of figures. The applications test uses your preinstalled MSOffice and Adobe Creative Suite to perform real-world productivity tests. Both synthetic code and open-source productivity applications are used to derive results, so no matter where you stand on benchmarking methodology, PCMark has you covered.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |